On $45,000 annual income? You Can Still Buy A Property in Australia

Every time a new “housing affordability” headline drops, it tends to come with one terrifying number: the household income needed to buy the median house in the most expensive capital. According to Cotality’s (formerly CoreLogic RP Data) latest Chart of the Month, that number for Sydney is now $178,194 — a figure that’s pushed plenty of would-be buyers to give up before they’ve even started.

But that headline number is answering the wrong question. It tells you what it costs to buy the middle-priced house in the country’s most expensive city. It doesn’t tell you what it costs to buy a property — which, for a huge number of buyers, is the question that actually matters.

When you ask Cotality’s June 2026 data that question instead, the answer is surprising: someone on a genuinely modest household income of around $45,000 a year is closer to property ownership than almost anyone realises. Not everywhere, and not by buying the obvious thing — but the door is open if you know which one to walk through.

What the data actually shows

Cotality’s Chart of the Month models the minimum household income required to service a home loan in each capital city, at both the median price and the 25th percentile (lower quartile) price, for both houses and units, as at 31 May 2026. The modelling assumes a 20% deposit, a principal-and-interest 30-year loan, current market rates of 6.25% (up from 5.5% in January), a 3% serviceability buffer, and other household expenses capped at 30% of income.

Run across eight cities and two property types, that produces sixteen different “entry prices” — not one. And right at the bottom of that list sits a number almost nobody is talking about.

The $45k entry point: Darwin, 25th percentile unit

As at May 2026, the minimum household income required to buy a 25th percentile unit in Darwin is $44,773 — within a few hundred dollars of $45,000, and the lowest income hurdle of any property type in any capital city in the country.

That’s not a typo, and it’s not an outer-suburb fringe lot. It’s the most affordable legitimate entry point into the Australian property market today, according to Cotality’s own modelling.

It also illustrates a broader pattern hiding in plain sight in this data: the gap between “unaffordable” and “affordable” isn’t about whether you can buy property — it’s about which property, and where.

Three levers that move the income bar

1. Buy a unit, not a house

The single biggest lever in this dataset is property type. In every city, the income required to buy a unit is dramatically lower than for a house:

City Median house Median unit Income saved
Sydney $178,194 $102,030 $76,164
Brisbane $139,077 $99,836 $39,241
Perth $123,787 $86,740 $37,047
Melbourne $108,126 $71,843 $36,283

A house in Sydney requires nearly 75% more income than a unit in the same city. For most first-time buyers, that single decision — house versus unit — does more to close the affordability gap than years of saving ever could.

2. Target the 25th percentile, not the median

The second lever is price point within the same property type. The “median” is simply the middle of the market — there’s an entire lower half below it. Cotality’s 25th percentile figures show what’s achievable if you’re willing to buy a smaller, older, or less central property rather than the “average” one:

City Median unit 25th percentile unit Income saved
Brisbane $99,836 $86,324 $13,512
Sydney $102,030 $79,812 $22,218
Perth $86,740 $73,431 $13,309
Melbourne $71,843 $56,946 $14,897
Darwin $52,065 $44,773 $7,292

This is the lever most buyers never even consider, because real estate marketing — and our own instincts — pull us toward the “best” property we can imagine, not the most achievable one. Strategically, the 25th percentile isn’t a compromise; it’s a foothold.

3. Rentvest — separate where you live from where you invest

The third, and arguably most powerful, lever is geography. There’s no rule that says you have to buy where you live.

Rentvesting means continuing to rent in the city you want to live in — close to work, family, lifestyle — while buying an investment property somewhere your income actually stretches to. Use the rental income and capital growth on that asset to build equity, while staying flexible about your own living situation.

Looked at through this lens, someone living and renting in Sydney isn’t limited to Sydney’s $178,194 median-house income bar. They could instead target:

  • A 25th percentile unit in Darwin ($44,773)
  • A 25th percentile unit in ACT ($53,864)
  • A 25th percentile unit in Melbourne ($56,946)
  • A 25th percentile unit in Hobart ($57,030)

All four are within reach of a single modest income, let alone a dual-income household — while the buyer keeps living exactly where they want to.

The full ladder of entry points (lowest to highest)

City 25th percentile unit (May-26)
Darwin $44,773
ACT $53,864
Melbourne $56,946
Hobart $57,030
Adelaide $68,421
Perth $73,431
Sydney $79,812
Brisbane $86,324

Notice Melbourne’s position on this list. Among the major eastern-seaboard capitals, Melbourne is consistently the most affordable — its median house ($108,126) requires less income than the 25th percentile house in either Sydney ($136,660) or Brisbane ($112,903). For buyers and investors weighing up where to start, that relative affordability is hard to ignore.

Where $45k genuinely isn’t enough — yet

To be clear, $45,000 doesn’t unlock every door. Brisbane’s 25th percentile unit now requires $86,324 — up almost $12,000 since January, the steepest rise of any lower-quartile unit market in the country. A median Sydney house at $178,194 is, for now, out of reach on a single modest income regardless of strategy.

That’s precisely the point. The buyers getting stuck aren’t the ones priced out of the market entirely — they’re the ones only ever looking at the one door (median house, home city) that happens to be the most expensive door in the building.

The real takeaway

Property in Australia hasn’t quietly become “cheap.” What this data shows is that affordability was never a single number — it’s a spectrum shaped by property type, price point, and location, and there’s far more room to move within that spectrum than most people assume.

A $45,000 income isn’t a barrier to property ownership in Australia in 2026. It’s a constraint that simply requires a different strategy than the one everyone defaults to: a unit instead of a house, the 25th percentile instead of the median, and — increasingly — a rentvesting approach that separates lifestyle from investment.

The market hasn’t moved to meet first-time buyers and investors. But the data shows clearly that there’s more than one way to move to meet the market.


Data source: Cotality (formerly CoreLogic RP Data) Chart of the Month, “What is the minimum household income necessary to purchase a home?”, based on median and 25th percentile home values as at 31 May 2026. Figures assume a 20% deposit on a principal-and-interest 30-year loan at market interest rates (6.25% in May 2026, up from 5.5% in January 2026), with a 3% serviceability buffer, and other household expenses assumed to be 30% of household income. This article is general information only and does not constitute financial or lending advice — borrowing capacity varies by lender and individual circumstances.

Considering a rentvesting strategy or unsure which market suits your budget?

Nest or Invest works with buyers across VIC, QLD, WA and SA to find the right entry point — wherever that turns out to be.

Related Articles:

Like this article?

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on Linkdin
Share on Pinterest